Head to head

Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med vs University of Hawaii at Manoa

Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med (Honolulu, HI) and University of Hawaii at Manoa (Honolulu, HI) compared on cost, admissions, size, and outcomes, using each college’s own federal reporting. Every comparison below is drawn from figures both colleges report — where only one reports a number, no comparison is made.

Side-by-side comparison

Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med and University of Hawaii at Manoa compared on cost, admissions, enrollment, and outcomes.
MeasureInstitute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental MedUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa
LocationHonolulu, HIHonolulu, HI
Institution typeUniversityUniversity
Public or privatePrivatePublic
Campus settingUrbanUrban
Published in-state tuitionSticker price before aid$10,530$12,186
Published out-of-state tuition$10,530$34,218
Average net priceAverage paid after grants and scholarshipsNot reported$15,664
Acceptance rate85%87%
SAT range (middle 50%)842–10771020–1240
Total enrollment7,68218,986
Graduation rateNot reported64%
First-year retentionNot reported81%

What the numbers show

  • Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med has the lower published in-state tuition ($10,530 vs $12,186 at University of Hawaii at Manoa).
  • Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med has the lower published out-of-state tuition ($10,530 vs $34,218 at University of Hawaii at Manoa).
  • Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med has the lower acceptance rate (85% vs 87% at University of Hawaii at Manoa).
  • University of Hawaii at Manoa has the larger student body (18,986 students vs 7,682 students at Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med).

How to read this comparison

Every statement above is a direct comparison of two reported figures, and appears only when bothcolleges report that measure. Where one reports and the other does not, the row shows “Not reported” and no conclusion is drawn — a data gap is not a finding.

CampusPin does not rank these colleges or declare a winner. A lower acceptance rate is not a quality score, a higher graduation rate partly reflects who a college admits, and published tuition is not what most students pay. Which college is better depends on your program, your finances, and your circumstances.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med or University of Hawaii at Manoa?
Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med has the lower published in-state tuition: $10,530 versus $12,186.
Is Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med or University of Hawaii at Manoa harder to get into?
Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med has the lower acceptance rate — 85% versus 87%. A lower acceptance rate means more applicants per seat; it is not by itself a measure of academic quality or of your own chances.
Which has the better graduation rate, Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med or University of Hawaii at Manoa?
Graduation rates are not reported for both colleges, so they cannot be compared here.

Keep going on CampusPin

Narrow this list with the full filter set, or put any two colleges side by side.

Data sources & methodology

Figures for Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med and University of Hawaii at Manoa come from federal datasets and each institution's own reporting.

Sources used across this page

Not every source informs every figure. Each data point draws on the source appropriate to it see the relevant section and the data dictionary for field-level provenance.

Where a value is unavailable it is shown as unavailable, never as 0, free, or a negative judgment. Always confirm final details with the institution before applying.

Suggested citation

CampusPin. Institute of Clinical Acupuncture & Oriental Med vs University of Hawaii at Manoa. Retrieved from https://campuspin.com/compare/institute-of-clinical-acupuncture-and-oriental-med-vs-university-of-hawaii-at-manoa